Justice
Justice
Justice
Documentary
100
Watch TV Show
Download TV Show
Overview
Justice is the first Harvard course to be made freely available online and on public television. In this 12-part series, college professor Michael Sandel challenges us with hard moral dilemmas and invites us to ponder the right thing to do—in politics and in our everyday lives.
Status: Ended
First Air Date: 2009-09-13
Runtime: 0h 30m
Director: Unknown
Writer: Michael Sandel
Top Cast
Michael Sandel
Michael Sandel
Self
Episodes - Season 1
The Moral Side of Murder/The Case for Cannibalism
The Moral Side of Murder/The Case for Cannibalism
Episode 1
If you had to choose between killing one person to save the lives of five others and doing nothing, even though you knew that five people would die right before your eyes if you did nothing—what would you do? What would be the right thing to do?
Putting a Price Tag on Life/How to Measure Pleasure
Putting a Price Tag on Life/How to Measure Pleasure
Episode 2
Sandel presents some contemporary cases in which cost-benefit analysis was used to put a dollar value on human life. The cases give rise to several objections to the utilitarian logic of seeking “the greatest good for the greatest number.” Is it possible to sum up and compare all values using a common measure like money?
Free to Choose/Who Owns Me?
Free to Choose/Who Owns Me?
Episode 3
Sandel introduces the libertarian notion that redistributive taxation—taxing the rich to give to the poor—is akin to forced labor. If you live in a society that has a system of progressive taxation, aren’t you obligated to pay your taxes? Don’t many rich people often acquire their wealth through sheer luck or family fortune?
The Land is My Land/Consenting Adults
The Land is My Land/Consenting Adults
Episode 4
The philosopher John Locke believes that individuals have certain rights—to life, liberty, and property—which were given to us as human beings in the “the state of nature,” a time before government and laws were created. According to Locke, our natural rights are governed by the law of nature, known by reason, which says that we can neither give them up nor take them away from anyone else.
Hired Guns?/For Sale: Motherhood
Hired Guns?/For Sale: Motherhood
Episode 5
During the Civil War, men drafted into war had the option of hiring substitutes to fight in their place. Many students say they find that policy unjust, arguing that it is unfair to allow the affluent to avoid serving and risking their lives by paying less privileged citizens to fight in their place. Is today’s voluntary army open to the same objection? Professor Sandel examines the principle of free-market exchange as it relates to reproductive rights. Students debate the nature of informed consent, the morality of selling a human life, and the meaning of maternal rights.
Mind Your Motive/The Supreme Principle of Morality
Mind Your Motive/The Supreme Principle of Morality
Episode 6
Professor Sandel introduces Immanuel Kant, a challenging but influential philosopher. Kant rejects the notion that morality is about calculating consequences. When we act out of duty—doing something simply because it is right—only then do our actions have moral worth.
A Lesson In Lying/A Deal Is A Deal
A Lesson In Lying/A Deal Is A Deal
Episode 7
Immanuel Kant believed that telling a lie, even a white lie, is a violation of one’s own dignity. Sandel introduces the modern philosopher, John Rawls, who argues that a fair set of principles would be those principles we would all agree to if we had to choose rules for our society and no one had any unfair bargaining power.
What's A Fair Start?/What Do We Deserve?
What's A Fair Start?/What Do We Deserve?
Episode 8
Rawls argues that even meritocracy—a distributive system that rewards effort—doesn’t go far enough in leveling the playing field because those who are naturally gifted will always get ahead. Furthermore, says Rawls, the naturally gifted can’t claim much credit because their success often depends on factors as arbitrary as birth order. Sandel discusses the fairness of pay differentials in modern society.
Arguing Affirmative Action/What's The Purpose?
Arguing Affirmative Action/What's The Purpose?
Episode 9
Students discuss the pros and cons of affirmative action. Should we try to correct for inequality in educational backgrounds by taking race into consideration? Should we compensate for historical injustices such as slavery and segregation? Is the argument in favor of promoting diversity a valid one? How does it size up against the argument that a student’s efforts and achievements should carry more weight than factors that are out of his or her control and therefore arbitrary? When a university’s stated mission is to increase diversity, is it a violation of rights to deny a white person admission? Sandel introduces Aristotle and his theory of justice. He believes that justice is about giving people their due, what they deserve.
The Good Citizen/ Freedom Vs. Fit
The Good Citizen/ Freedom Vs. Fit
Episode 10
Aristotle believes the purpose of politics is to promote and cultivate the virtue of its citizens. The telos or goal of the state and political community is the “good life”. And those citizens who contribute most to the purpose of the community are the ones who should be most rewarded. But how do we know the purpose of a community or a practice? How does Aristotle address the issue of individual rights and the freedom to choose? If our place in society is determined by where we best fit, doesn’t that eliminate personal choice? What if I am best suited to do one kind of work, but I want to do another?
The Claims Of Community/Where Our Loyaty Lies
The Claims Of Community/Where Our Loyaty Lies
Episode 11
Communitarians argue that, in addition to voluntary and universal duties, we also have obligations of membership, solidarity, and loyalty. These obligations are not necessarily based on consent. We inherit our past, and our identities, from our family, city, or country. But what happens if our obligations to our family or community come into conflict with our universal obligations to humanity? Do we owe more to our fellow citizens that to citizens of other countries? Is patriotism a virtue, or a prejudice for one’s own kind? If our identities are defined by the particular communities we inhabit, what becomes of universal human rights?
Debating Same-Sex Marriage/The Good Life
Debating Same-Sex Marriage/The Good Life
Episode 12
If principles of justice depend on the moral or intrinsic worth of the ends that rights serve, how should we deal with the fact that people hold different ideas and conceptions of what is good? Can we settle the matter without discussing the moral permissibility of homosexuality or the purpose of marriage? Sandel believes government can’t be neutral on difficult moral questions, such as same-sex marriage and abortion, and asks why we shouldn’t deliberate all issues—including economic and civic concerns—with that same moral and spiritual aspiration.
Recommendations

Counting with Paula
100
Animation
Counting with Paula
Heart of Loyalty
33
Heart of Loyalty
Bison: The Mannequin Case
83
Drama
Bison: The Mannequin Case
I Am Sorry, I Love You
80
Drama
I Am Sorry, I Love You
Movies That Shook the World
70
Movies That Shook the World
Rebound
65
Comedy
Rebound
Olympus Guardian
80
Animation
Olympus Guardian
Deadliest Catch: Bloodline
86
Deadliest Catch: Bloodline
Læger til salg
100
Læger til salg
Thus Spoke Kishibe Rohan
78
Thus Spoke Kishibe Rohan
Rangrasiya
70
Comedy
Drama
Rangrasiya
Foodtastic
38
Foodtastic
Give a Show!
80
Drama
Give a Show!
48 Heures
75
48 Heures
The People Next Door
50
Comedy
The People Next Door
温柔的背叛
75
温柔的背叛
The Shadow of the Tower
50
Drama
The Shadow of the Tower